D Young & Co | The correct approach to comparison of signs in EU…
Pollini v. Collini: Omission of review of trademark use - Legal Patent
Comparison of signs in EU trade mark law
Are you XKING kidding me? Making sense of trade mark conflict in the EUTM system - The IPKat
When appealing bears fruit: Pear Technologies v EUIPO – Apple | International Lawyers Network - JDSupra
CITMA - For Athlon, it figures
Similarity of Union figurative marks - word element decisive - Legal Patent
The correct approach to comparison of signs in EU trade mark law - Lexology
When appealing bears fruit: Pear Technologies v EUIPO – Apple | ILN IP Insider
The Likelihood Of Confusion In The European Union Trade Mark Opposition Procedure – Part II - Intellectual Property - European Union
Case T-44/20 Chanel SAS v EUIPO › Kanzlei Hoefer & Partner
AC Milan Fails to Register Its New Club Crest in The EU
Nestlé wins in trademark dispute ONE: Renewed EUIPO examination flawed - Legal Patent
NORWAY: District Court in non-EU country aiming with EUIPO Guidelines - Kluwer Trademark Blog
Overcoming the language barrier: EU trademarks and conceptual similarity | Novagraaf
Cp180056en
The EU General Court on relative grounds for refusal: the Chanel judgment - The IPKat
CJEU rules on counteraction by conceptual differences in trade mark law, but leaves much to be resolved - The IPKat
Highly Reputable Trade Marks: Puma SE v EUIPO, A Case Study - Lexology
Relationship between trade marks and designs Dr Jur
Chanel's logo and interlocking 3s (or Ss) – same overall impression? - Kluwer Trademark Blog
Europe – General Court: Bad faith's link to likelihood of confusion | Hogan Lovells - JDSupra
Is Article 8(3) EUTMR applicable only to identical marks? The General Court pitches in, but it is not the last word yet. - Kluwer Trademark Blog
Nestlé wins in trademark dispute ONE: Renewed EUIPO examination flawed - Legal Patent
Databases
